Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-08-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. Motorola One Action's design is way newer, a bit lighter and a little thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola One Action has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Action features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Action also has a larger number of cores.
The Motorola One Action features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, they both have the same video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S7 Active has just a bit better battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Motorola One Action is more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.