Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 435 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Motorola One Action, with an 80.1 score against 78.5. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing here, it must be noted that it is also extremely thicker and extremely heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixel number per inch in the display.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Action. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Motorola One Action has a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back camera, the Motorola One Action also counts with a way higher video definition.
Motorola One Action has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has greater battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Action, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.