Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Motorola One Action, having a general score of 81 against 78.5. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro construction is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola One Action. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Motorola One Action has a slightly better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola One Action also has a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution and a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Motorola One Action has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One Action, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.