Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Motorola One Action, having an 88.5 score against 78.5. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola One Action were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is incredibly thinner but a little heavier than Motorola One Action.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has faster video frame rate. The Motorola One Action counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Action features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola One Action, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.