Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the Motorola One Action, having a global score of 85.6 against 78.5. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is newer and a lot thinner than the Motorola One Action's, but it's also a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Action takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have a same resolution camera and the same diafragm aperture.
The Motorola One Action features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Action has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.