Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Motorola One Action, having a global score of 94.6 against 78.5. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's way thinner and newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Action features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2520px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better video frame rates.
The Motorola One Action counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Action, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.