Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Blasting black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than the Motorola One Action, with a 90.1 score against 78.5. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro construction is heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola One Action. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better screen than Motorola One Action, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit greater display density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Motorola One Action counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.