Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than the Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Motorola One Action. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit inferior pixels amount per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola One Action features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a superior battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.