Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Motorola One Action were only released 9 months apart, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is a bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the Motorola One Action.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola One Action features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a little higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The Motorola One Action counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheaper than the Motorola One Action, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.