Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with a general score of 78.5 against 78.1. Despite of the fact Motorola One Action is older and somewhat thicker than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's body is still a little bit lighter. Motorola One Action counts with a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features just a little better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light environments, a lot higher video resolution and a way more mega-pixels camera.
The Motorola One Action has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with improved battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 31 percent greater battery capacity.
The Motorola One Action is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.