Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is much better than Motorola One Hyper, with a global score of 93.2 against 79.8. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola One Hyper comes with Android 11 operating system. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is newer and thinner than the Motorola One Hyper's, although it's also somewhat heavier.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a superior CPU than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and more RAM memory. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels, a little bit larger screen and a just a little better pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Motorola One Hyper features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper has just a bit longer battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3687mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.