Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a global score of 81.6 against 79.8. The iPhone 7 body is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola One Hyper, even though it was released 3 years before. The iPhone 7 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a little bit worse screen pixels density, a much smaller display and a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334px.
The Motorola One Hyper features a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 7, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. IPhone 7 has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Hyper, although it has 4 lesser cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM.
Motorola One Hyper features a superior camera than iPhone 7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 7 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.