Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Apple iPhone X's body is thinner and lighter than Motorola One Hyper, even though it was released many years before. The iPhone X counts with a much better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Apple iPhone X has a faster processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Motorola One Hyper features a greater memory to install applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.