Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Despite of the fact that the iPhone XR is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's body is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Apple iPhone XR counts with a better performing processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a quite smaller display, a way lower 828 x 1792px resolution and a bit inferior pixels number per display inch. The Motorola One Hyper features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Hyper has greater battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 36% more battery size. The Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.