Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 79.8. The Apple iPhone XS construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper, even though it was released just a bit more than a year before. The iPhone XS counts with a better processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has lesser CPU cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone XS has a more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a quite greater count of pixels in each inch in the display. The Motorola One Hyper features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh. Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.