Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom's general score of 76.2. Motorola One Hyper's construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Hyper and Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom feature incredibly similar CPUs, both have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.