Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper, with an 81.1 score against 79.8. Despite of the fact the Google Nexus 6 is much older and somewhat thicker than the Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Nexus 6 has an older 5.1 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
The Google Nexus 6 has a brighter display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Google Nexus 6 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a way better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera with way more megapixels and a larger camera aperture.
Motorola One Hyper features improved battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Nexus 6, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.