Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a score of 80.2 against 79.8. Even though the Google Pixel is incredibly older than Motorola One Hyper, it's body is a little thinner and incredibly lighter. Google Pixel counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little greater screen pixels density.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has 4 more CPU cores (although they are slower).
The Motorola One Hyper takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Motorola One Hyper has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 44% greater battery size.
Google Pixel not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola One Hyper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.