Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having an 82.5 score against 79.8. The Google Pixel 2 XL design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Google Pixel 2 XL has a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with way more MP.
Motorola One Hyper has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper features a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.