Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's body is thinner and a lot lighter. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Motorola One Hyper has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.