Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a general score of 80.7 against 79.8. Google Pixel 3 XL is an older phone than Motorola One Hyper, but Google was able to build it just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola One Hyper captures better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3430mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.