Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. Despite being the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also a bit thicker and way heavier. Both devices in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should offer very similar operating system features.
The Motorola One Hyper and the Google Pixel 3a feature similar processors, they have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Motorola One Hyper has improved battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.