Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with a 79.8 score against 78.9. The Motorola One Hyper body is just a little thicker and heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a display that is very similar to the display in Motorola One Hyper, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Google Pixel 3a XL's processor is very similar to the processor in Motorola One Hyper, both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Motorola One Hyper has much more storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Motorola One Hyper features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.