Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 global score. Even when Google Pixel 4 and Motorola One Hyper were only released 1 months apart, Google Pixel 4 is just a bit thinner and lighter. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Hyper features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4 is also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.