Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, with an 82.9 score against 79.8. Although Google Pixel 4 XL and the Motorola One Hyper were released with only 1 months difference, Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with much more MP.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save some money, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.