Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give identical OS features. The Google Pixel 4a is a extremely lighter and just a little bit thinner device than the Motorola One Hyper, even when both of them were released only 9 months apart.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixels density.
Motorola One Hyper features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The Motorola One Hyper has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also cheap compared to the Motorola One Hyper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.