Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 global score. These phones use the same Android 11 OS. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is newer, lighter and a bit thinner than Motorola One Hyper. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a little bit greater screen density. Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera. Motorola One Hyper has a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.