Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Google Pixel 5 is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola One Hyper. Google Pixel 5 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch. Motorola One Hyper takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.