Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is better than Motorola One Hyper, with a 92.1 score against 79.8. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design design has the same thickness than the Motorola One Hyper, but it's heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has newer 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a little bit greater display pixel density, a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 and a bit bigger screen. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 20 GB more RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot worse resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 896 GB more internal memory.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 40 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.