Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the HTC U11, having a overall score of 79.8 against 77.6. The Motorola One Hyper is a way newer cellphone than HTC U11, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier. HTC U11 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
HTC U11 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola One Hyper features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than HTC U11, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Hyper counts with superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 33% bigger battery size. Motorola One Hyper features a superior camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, but if you don't you can save some money and get the HTC U11, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.