Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Motorola One Hyper is a newer cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, but it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier.
Motorola One Hyper has a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower). The LG G7 Fit has a much sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
Motorola One Hyper has much more storage for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.