Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a general score of 81 against 79.8. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. The LG G7 ThinQ is an older phone than Motorola One Hyper, but it is lighter and thinner anyway.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. LG G7 ThinQ features a much sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The Motorola One Hyper features a little bit more storage for games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Hyper has better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG G7 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.