Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a general score of 84.3 against 79.8. LG G8 ThinQ is a lighter and a little thinner cellphone than Motorola One Hyper, although they were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One Hyper features just a little better battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 14% larger battery size. Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The LG G8 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.