Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having an 82.5 score against 79.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the LG G8S ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and improved performance. The LG G8S ThinQ is a a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Motorola One Hyper, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2248 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher display density. LG G8S ThinQ features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G8S ThinQ also has more RAM. Motorola One Hyper captures much better photos and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Motorola One Hyper has just a little bit longer battery performance than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.