Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than LG Q8, having a overall score of 79.8 against 77.2. The Motorola One Hyper design is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG Q8. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and LG Q8 has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG Q8, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has more cores. LG Q8 features a better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Motorola One Hyper has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG Q8, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Motorola One Hyper counts with superior battery life than LG Q8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Motorola One Hyper features a superior camera than LG Q8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.