Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, giving you a couple nice extra features. Even though Motorola One Hyper and the LG Stylo 6 were only released 6 months apart, Motorola One Hyper's construction is a bit thicker but just a bit lighter than the LG Stylo 6.
LG Stylo 6 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. LG Stylo 6 features a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The LG Stylo 6 and Motorola One Hyper both count with quite similar batteries.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG Stylo 6, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.