Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the LG V10's general score of 78.6. Although the Motorola One Hyper is much newer than LG V10, it is just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has the newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version.
LG V10 features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola One Hyper counts with a little bit better processing power than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Motorola One Hyper shoots clearer pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs in low-light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Motorola One Hyper features a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG V10, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Hyper has better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs more money than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, else you can save some money and get the LG V10, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.