Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the Motorola One Hyper, it's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. Motorola One Hyper features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola One Hyper features improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.