Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 global score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is lighter and thinner.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a higher screen density. The Motorola One Hyper counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola One Hyper features improved battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper shoots better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images and/or video in low light environments and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V40 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.