Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. The LG V60 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than Motorola One Hyper, but it's just a little heavier. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bit bigger display.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video definition and the same video frame rate. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ features better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Motorola One Hyper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.