Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a 91.2 score against 79.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG Wing has an older 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. Even though LG Wing is newer than Motorola One Hyper, it is much heavier and thicker.
LG Wing has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM. LG Wing has a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite worse pixels count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bit bigger display.
The LG Wing takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a back camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution, the LG Wing also has a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations and faster video frame rates.
LG Wing counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG Wing and Motorola One Hyper count with incredibly similar batteries duration.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Hyper, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.