Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 overall score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Even being the best in this comparison, the Motorola One Hyper construction is a lot older, heavier and thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
Motorola One Hyper has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better screen than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a little more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower 50 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.