Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a score of 83.4 against 79.8. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design is newer, just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola One Hyper. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger display.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations. Motorola One Hyper features more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.