Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple additional features. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a way newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than Motorola One Hyper.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch and a little bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760. The Motorola One Hyper features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.