Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 86.3 score against 79.8. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little lighter and a little thinner than Motorola One Hyper. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much worse 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.