Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, providing the user some extra features and better performance. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is much newer, a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Hyper.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola One Hyper features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a much less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little longer battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.