Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-12-04 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 350.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a 79.8 score against 75.8. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Motorola One Hyper design is extremely newer than the Moto Z Force's, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger number of cores. Moto Z Force has a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Motorola One Hyper features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola One Hyper has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto Z Force, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.