Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a general score of 79.8 against 77.4. Although Motorola One Hyper is a lot newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's way thicker and way heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a screen that's very similar to the Motorola One Hyper one, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One Hyper features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One Hyper has a way better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.