Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Moto Z3, having a overall score of 79.8 against 77.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola One Hyper is a newer phone than Moto Z3, although it is thicker and incredibly heavier.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a bit higher display density.
Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography.
The Motorola One Hyper has a little bit better storage for games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Hyper counts with greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Motorola One Hyper costs more than Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.