Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the Moto Z3 Play, with a 79.8 score against 76.3. The Motorola One Hyper construction is newer than Moto Z3 Play's, although it is way thicker and way heavier. Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a display that is just as good as Motorola One Hyper's screen, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch.
Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Hyper has better battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola One Hyper is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.